By Fatih Er, World Bulletin
Israel's critical election period is over. Since the "1948 Arabs" decided to go to the polls the turnout has increased dramatically. The Israeli media has been emphasizing high turnover as a sign of a democratic progress in the country and trying to demonstrate it to the West. The results of this high-turnout elections did not disappoint the pollsters. The Israeli right wing has got the majority in the Parliament. But that does not mean they will be able to establish a government.
According to the results Benjamin Netanyahu's party 'Likud Beyteynu' together with other right-wing parties have won 62 seats in the Parliament. Left-wing parties, among them the 'Yesh Atid' party established by a former journalist Yair Lapid who started his political career in 2006, have gained 46 seats. This simple arithmetic demonstrates that there will be a lot of haggling in the Israeli politics in the days to come.
Netanyahu, whose party got the majority of votes and who knows the Parliament arithmetic very well and has the bargaining power, will most probably initiate a new government coalition. But that does not mean Netanyahu will knock at the doors of all the right-wing parties. Because solutions to many important issues like permanent peace with Palestine in the upcoming period, relations with the other countries in the region, and even apologizing to Turkey, will depend on the partners Netanyahu chooses for his new government.
Netanyahu will not be able to overcome these troubles with the hawkish Habayit Hayehudi and Shash parties who shelter the extreme right militants and have set their heart on the Jewish religious law. Bibi will not be able to move on neither with a one left-wing and two right-wing party coalition nor with one right-wing and two left-wing parties. It is impossible to bring the parties with diametrically opposite views together to look for a solution to chronic problems.It is clear that if Netanyahu makes a coalition with only right-wing parties the problems in the region will double. A coalition with Hatora, who by no means wishes a Palestinian state to exist, Hayehudi, who insists on mass exile of Arabs from the country, or Shash, who has adopted Jewish religious law as the basic principle, would not only fuel the Palestinian issue but would also portend a probable clash with Iran.
At the same time such a radical government would take critical decisions on the country's north, namely the Sina region, and that would double the problems with Egypt where changes are underway. There is no need to write about what would happen to Gaza then.
Even if Netanyahu decides upon the right-wing coalition, he cannot avoid taking in Shaul Mofaz with his 'Kadima' party. Mofaz, who could only be a part of Netanyahu's coalition for 5 weeks though he had two representatives, will never accept entering the coalition unless he is in charge of the Defense Ministry. Interesting scenarios will be discussed in the Israeli politics and new political plans will be worked out but in the end of the day a coalition will be established. As Israeli politicians love their seats to the point of sickness, they well might step away from their principles. Who knows, maybe Israel will have a parliamentary coalition resembling the DSP-MHP and ANAP coalition that was once formed in Turkey. Here is what Knesset looks like after the election:
CENTER AND RIGHT PARTIES CENTER AND LEFT PARTIES
LİKUD BEYTEYNU ................ 31 YEŞ ATİD............................19
HABAYİT HAYEHUDİ................11 HAAVODA......................... 15
ŞAS........................................11 HATNUA............................ 6
HAGUDAT HATORA................ 7 MERETZ............................ 6
Duterte’s pivot toward China would likely to continue and strengthen, but it would also likely weaken, if not vanish its relationship with US. This is actually an indication of US’ weakening influence in the region.
Even though there seems to be a softening in the internal politics of the Greeks, the idea of Cyprus joining with Greece is still alive.
In the future of Russia, who has one sixth of the livable land in the world, there seems to be no unity either in the name of nationalism or on the basis of Orthodox Christianity. It is foreseen that Putin, who continues to see the dream of a USSR which has been disintegrated, will try and achieve unity by way of federations in order to bring to fruition his enthusiasm of a new empire.
Specifically for last 20 years, Turkey’s efforts to strenghten its relationship with Balkans has gained big momentum and today Turkey seems to be a quite influential player in the region. Conversation with Mr. Edhem Foco, (General Manager of Al Jazereera Balkan)
There are some semblances in both the countries and the narrative is almost similar, and the chief sponsors of extremism are also common.
The Europeans are finding it difficult to understand the discussions regarding the agreement which has been finalized as 2334 pages, after the negotiations which has lasted seven years between Brussels and Ottawa.
A new leadership has to respond to a varied set of local and international challenges
Jakartans have proved themselves as more open-minded and democratic much before the London, they voted and elected a Christian and ethnic Chinese deputy-governor as the running mate of Joko Widodo, often referred to as Jokowi.
Whilst DAESH is a US creation, it is evident that it serves the British interest and aims to destabilise the remaining stable states in the region
The elections held on the 18th of September for Duma which is the lower wing of the parliament, resulted in a victory for the United Russia party
Ibrahim Rasool, the former and the first Muslim South African Ambassador to the United States
Even though Uzbekistan swayed to and fro between Russia and the USA, there have never been positive signs in the quality of its governance until today, on the contrary it has even gone backwards
Every Thai government, whether democratically elected or through the military coup d’état always find it difficult to ignore radical Buddhist northerners’ demand of a hard-line approach towards the predominantly Muslim south
The war crimes tribunal in Bangladesh, established to try those who committed atrocities is under fire for its hanging of Jamaat–e-Islami members
“The crimes committed during the war of independence were horrific, but the death sentences only perpetuate violence. The lack of fair trials makes the use of death penalty even more disturbing.” stated David Griffiths, research director, Amnesty International, South Asia.
Operation Euphrates Shield can be best understood by viewing it in context with the history of the Middle East