By Fatih Er, World Bulletin
Israel's critical election period is over. Since the "1948 Arabs" decided to go to the polls the turnout has increased dramatically. The Israeli media has been emphasizing high turnover as a sign of a democratic progress in the country and trying to demonstrate it to the West. The results of this high-turnout elections did not disappoint the pollsters. The Israeli right wing has got the majority in the Parliament. But that does not mean they will be able to establish a government.
According to the results Benjamin Netanyahu's party 'Likud Beyteynu' together with other right-wing parties have won 62 seats in the Parliament. Left-wing parties, among them the 'Yesh Atid' party established by a former journalist Yair Lapid who started his political career in 2006, have gained 46 seats. This simple arithmetic demonstrates that there will be a lot of haggling in the Israeli politics in the days to come.
Netanyahu, whose party got the majority of votes and who knows the Parliament arithmetic very well and has the bargaining power, will most probably initiate a new government coalition. But that does not mean Netanyahu will knock at the doors of all the right-wing parties. Because solutions to many important issues like permanent peace with Palestine in the upcoming period, relations with the other countries in the region, and even apologizing to Turkey, will depend on the partners Netanyahu chooses for his new government.
Netanyahu will not be able to overcome these troubles with the hawkish Habayit Hayehudi and Shash parties who shelter the extreme right militants and have set their heart on the Jewish religious law. Bibi will not be able to move on neither with a one left-wing and two right-wing party coalition nor with one right-wing and two left-wing parties. It is impossible to bring the parties with diametrically opposite views together to look for a solution to chronic problems.It is clear that if Netanyahu makes a coalition with only right-wing parties the problems in the region will double. A coalition with Hatora, who by no means wishes a Palestinian state to exist, Hayehudi, who insists on mass exile of Arabs from the country, or Shash, who has adopted Jewish religious law as the basic principle, would not only fuel the Palestinian issue but would also portend a probable clash with Iran.
At the same time such a radical government would take critical decisions on the country's north, namely the Sina region, and that would double the problems with Egypt where changes are underway. There is no need to write about what would happen to Gaza then.
Even if Netanyahu decides upon the right-wing coalition, he cannot avoid taking in Shaul Mofaz with his 'Kadima' party. Mofaz, who could only be a part of Netanyahu's coalition for 5 weeks though he had two representatives, will never accept entering the coalition unless he is in charge of the Defense Ministry. Interesting scenarios will be discussed in the Israeli politics and new political plans will be worked out but in the end of the day a coalition will be established. As Israeli politicians love their seats to the point of sickness, they well might step away from their principles. Who knows, maybe Israel will have a parliamentary coalition resembling the DSP-MHP and ANAP coalition that was once formed in Turkey. Here is what Knesset looks like after the election:
CENTER AND RIGHT PARTIES CENTER AND LEFT PARTIES
LİKUD BEYTEYNU ................ 31 YEŞ ATİD............................19
HABAYİT HAYEHUDİ................11 HAAVODA......................... 15
ŞAS........................................11 HATNUA............................ 6
HAGUDAT HATORA................ 7 MERETZ............................ 6
Although the Kutu'l Amare victory did not change the course of World War I, the victory was a significant event that is to be cherished in its own right
Nothing is clear in Brazil’s murky political crisis, except that the country will suffer the consequences for a long time to come
US president hopes to prevent 'Brexit' and keep 'its eyes and ears' in the EU
The strategic partnership between India and Saudi Arabia with the entry of the UAE could be seen as an issue of contention for Pakistan
Unchallenged national election has turned world’s third most populous Muslim nation into a repressive, de facto one-party state
The Taliban leader has stated that they have never been in a better position and have issued a statement saying that they will not take part in reconciliation talks
Nowadays the 'secret documents' leaked are nothing other than the signs of a state of war and the conflict of global strategic interest
The doubts regarding the authenticity of the Myanmarese Nobel Peace Price winner after her angry reaction to being interviewed by a Muslim journalist
Belgium's colonial past shows that this small European country is not far behind its bigger imperial neighbors when it comes to brutality, savagery, racism and slavery
In wake of current event in Turkey, the question is if we witness a struggle between Turkish Islamism and a Kurdish one
Bangladesh’s High Court rejected a petition brought by secular activists challenging Islam’s status as the country’s official religion, so what does it entail
If Brussels is Europe's heart, those who attacked it as the 'other' to Europe should as well be determined
The eliminations of intra-party oppositions in the MHP will either pave the way for further damage within the party or it can be the beginnings of a fresh new leadership
The change in Tunisia is now mostly interpreted through the power struggle between secular elites and Islamists, the elections and following coalitions with increasing military influence
After years of fighting, MILF and the Philippine government under President Benigno S. Aquino III give sign of peace being possible
Leaving military strategy aside at this point, it is important to analyze the liberal Obama's military strategy against the strategy based on the Islamophobic approach of the neo-cons.