By Fatih Er, World Bulletin
Israel's critical election period is over. Since the "1948 Arabs" decided to go to the polls the turnout has increased dramatically. The Israeli media has been emphasizing high turnover as a sign of a democratic progress in the country and trying to demonstrate it to the West. The results of this high-turnout elections did not disappoint the pollsters. The Israeli right wing has got the majority in the Parliament. But that does not mean they will be able to establish a government.
According to the results Benjamin Netanyahu's party 'Likud Beyteynu' together with other right-wing parties have won 62 seats in the Parliament. Left-wing parties, among them the 'Yesh Atid' party established by a former journalist Yair Lapid who started his political career in 2006, have gained 46 seats. This simple arithmetic demonstrates that there will be a lot of haggling in the Israeli politics in the days to come.
Netanyahu, whose party got the majority of votes and who knows the Parliament arithmetic very well and has the bargaining power, will most probably initiate a new government coalition. But that does not mean Netanyahu will knock at the doors of all the right-wing parties. Because solutions to many important issues like permanent peace with Palestine in the upcoming period, relations with the other countries in the region, and even apologizing to Turkey, will depend on the partners Netanyahu chooses for his new government.
Netanyahu will not be able to overcome these troubles with the hawkish Habayit Hayehudi and Shash parties who shelter the extreme right militants and have set their heart on the Jewish religious law. Bibi will not be able to move on neither with a one left-wing and two right-wing party coalition nor with one right-wing and two left-wing parties. It is impossible to bring the parties with diametrically opposite views together to look for a solution to chronic problems.It is clear that if Netanyahu makes a coalition with only right-wing parties the problems in the region will double. A coalition with Hatora, who by no means wishes a Palestinian state to exist, Hayehudi, who insists on mass exile of Arabs from the country, or Shash, who has adopted Jewish religious law as the basic principle, would not only fuel the Palestinian issue but would also portend a probable clash with Iran.
At the same time such a radical government would take critical decisions on the country's north, namely the Sina region, and that would double the problems with Egypt where changes are underway. There is no need to write about what would happen to Gaza then.
Even if Netanyahu decides upon the right-wing coalition, he cannot avoid taking in Shaul Mofaz with his 'Kadima' party. Mofaz, who could only be a part of Netanyahu's coalition for 5 weeks though he had two representatives, will never accept entering the coalition unless he is in charge of the Defense Ministry. Interesting scenarios will be discussed in the Israeli politics and new political plans will be worked out but in the end of the day a coalition will be established. As Israeli politicians love their seats to the point of sickness, they well might step away from their principles. Who knows, maybe Israel will have a parliamentary coalition resembling the DSP-MHP and ANAP coalition that was once formed in Turkey. Here is what Knesset looks like after the election:
CENTER AND RIGHT PARTIES CENTER AND LEFT PARTIES
LİKUD BEYTEYNU ................ 31 YEŞ ATİD............................19
HABAYİT HAYEHUDİ................11 HAAVODA......................... 15
ŞAS........................................11 HATNUA............................ 6
HAGUDAT HATORA................ 7 MERETZ............................ 6
It was inevitable for this barren argument of modern times to be rekindled after a religious shadow had fallen on the political developments in the Middle East equation
The UN vote loss is directly connected to Turkey’s moral and people-friendly policies in the wake of Arab uprisings against pathetic dictatorships
India, under Modi, aspires to become a regional powerhouse and to play a more active and decisive role in the entire Asia Pacific region
By placing all blame on external powers and imperialists we neither solve the problems nor are we freed of the responsibility.
The reason the US conducted the strike on Aleppo alone, without their Arab League campaign allies, was to directly attack the Nusra Front.
The reconciliation process might be an important stage with regard to Kurdish policy, however, it should also not be permitted that all Kurds are rendered hostage.
After decades of creating, managing and executing the wars and conflicts the greedy American and European powers have adopted the way of outsourcing their wars to regional mercenary armies
At least nine imams were among 15 people arrested in Kosovo in September in the second major operation in weeks to try to stem the flow of young ethnic Albanians joining ISIL fighters in Iraq and Syria.
The perception of ISIL, which was established through the Neo-Orientalistic discourse, is turning into a media bribe for France, which is leading the old colonialists of Europe.
The ongoing ominous geo-political scenario prevailing in the Arab world stands to vindicate the bitter fact that the Arab monarchies are once again on the fast retreat to the days of Ignorance
Myanmar’s women have been suffering for the last several decades from systematic patterns of sexual violence
The growing mutuality between Pakistan and Turkey in varying spheres cannot be treated as incidental; it is deeply rooted in the history of both the nations, and which is bound to grow further
The separation story of Scotland stems from modern nationalism and perhaps from the fact that it’s the last chapter of a kind of story, which cost a lot to the whole world and our region in particular.
When we consider this with Ukrainian crisis in parallel, this conference includes the clues about the equations of the new Europe
What is normal for Kashmiris is abnormal for the world. Normal in Kashmir is usually associated with the pause in death.
Saudi Arabia and UAE, the most paranoid and oil-rich Arab League members, have emerged as top backers of status-quo in the region, ignoring the desires of populations for freedom and dignity