Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu has said Turkey and US have an alternative option, a Plan B, if the upcoming Geneva meeting fails to provide a viable political solution to the two-year-old Syrian conflict.
Speaking to a group of Turkish reporters on Friday, Davutoğlu talked about the recent developments in Syria at a time when Ankara faces a pile of challenges with regard to the intractable crisis in the Middle Eastern country.
Denying criticism suggesting that Turkey shifted its policy and was forced to back initiatives for a diplomatic solution as result of a strong pressure from the US and Russia, Davutoğlu said Turkey has always backed a diplomatic solution, adding that while other countries described the Bashar al-Assad regime illegitimate from the very beginning, Turkey has struggled to persuade Assad for a political solution for nine months.
Noting that Turkey has always been involved in diplomatic initiatives and efforts, Davutoğlu asserted that Turkey is in contact with Iran, Russia, Arab and Western countries, working on formulas which contemplate the political future of Syria with or without Assad.
He stated that such formulas that will be discussed in the second Geneva meeting were shaped during those diplomatic efforts and Ankara also contributed to the content of the formulas.
Expressing his hopes ahead of the Geneva meeting, Davutoğlu said Ankara and Washington had reached an accord over their standing on Syria during the meeting between Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and US President Barack Obama in Washington, D. C. on May 16.
Regarding the recent diplomatic efforts ahead of the conference, Davutoğlu said 11 countries, including Turkey, agreed on a common policy on May 22 during the Friends of Syria alliance meeting in Amman that is the exclusion of Assad in the formation of a new transitional government that will bring elements of the Assad regime and the Syrian opposition at the same time.
According to the proposal on which the countries agreed at the meeting in Amman, all powers and rights in new transitional government should be transferred to those who don’t have blood on their hands.
Davutoğlu, however, said if this formula, backed by Turkey for an enduring political solution, fails in the upcoming Geneva meeting, the type of support the 11 countries provide to the Syrian opposition will change, hinting that the international backers of Syrian National Council (SNC) would consider openly arming the opposition.
The Turkish foreign minister also said the EU is expected to lift arms embargo on opposition forces in a meeting of foreign ministers that is scheduled to take place on Monday. Davutoğlu will also attend the meeting.
Defending what he says a humanist and ethics-oriented standing of Turkey regarding the intractable Syrian conflict, the Turkish foreign minister identified three categories of states, relying on their response to the conflict.
“The first group involves states which conspicuously and persistently back the Assad regime. These kind of states, which do not welcome democracy in their political systems, see Syria at the core of their regional policies and therefore do their utmost to keep the Baath regime in power,” Davutoğlu said.
“The second group includes Western countries that are engaged in inconsistent policies regarding the Syrian crisis,” the foreign minister said, lamenting the fact that the Western world has remained indifferent to the ongoing bloodletting in the war-torn country although it had declared the Assad regime illegitimate from the very beginning.
Davutoğlu stated that Turkey and the Arab League fit to the third category, in which countries stand along with the Syrian people and become increasingly involved in the crisis, developing policies due to fast-moving changes on the ground.
He argued that if Turkey did not have an ethics-based standing and instead stood by the Assad regime, it would have been a historical mistake for Turkey and would set a bad example, as was in the case of Turkish foreign policy during the Algerian independence war against France in 1950s and early 1960s.
Davutoğlu also rebuked the charges of backing the wrong horse in the Syria crisis, deeming such criticism as unethical.
When asked about whether there has been a major failure in Turkish foreign policy regarding the prolonged Syrian crisis, Davutoğlu expressed his dismay, saying that they (Turkey) failed to predict the scale of violence that the Syrian regime and Assad could execute against their own people.
“We couldn’t know how barbarian Assad would become, acting differently from what his usual character suggests to be,” he told the reporters. “His mother has a great influence over Assad. She always reminds him of his father’s handling with the Hama.”
“We didn’t expect that those countries, which rushed to declare Assad regime illegitimate when the uprising began, could be so indifferent to the ongoing conflict,” said Davutoğlu.
“Turkey has failed to see that some countries would zigzag during the Syrian uprising as happened in the Bosnian crisis,” he said in an indirect reference to western powers.
He also lamented that designating use of chemical weapons as a “red line” gave a green light to Assad in using any conventional weapons and employing military methods rather than using the chemical weapons.
In addition, another major mistake, Davutoğlu said, has been the failure to see how susceptible and prone Turkish public is to the East-originated manipulative propaganda, in an implicit reference to the Iranian influence over some Turkish media outlets.
'Iran, Hezbollah involved in fighting'
As news reports suggest the increasing presence of Iranian military officials and Hezbollah fighters in the Syrian conflict, Davutoğlu said the two actors have been involved in the battlefield since March in an act of solidarity with the embattled Assad regime.
Currently, 2,000 Hezbollah fighters are engaged in heavy clashes around the town of Qusayr, a scene of armed skirmishes between the opposition forces and Assad troops, Davutoğlu said.
He portrayed the new development as an attempt to tip the balance on the battleground in favor of the Assad regime in order to push the sides to accept a solution that leaves Assad in power.
‘West’s denial of military support to FSA contributed to al-Nusra's growing clout’
Turkish foreign minister also touched upon the radical opposition al-Nusra Front, which currently appears to be the most coherent and capable militant forces among the fractured and disparate opposition fighters at a critical time as forces loyal to Assad seems to be ascendant on battlefield over the past two months.
Al Qaeda-linked al-Nusra Front is recognized as a terrorist organization by the US and is seen as a primary factor for the West's reluctance of arming the opposition forces. The West is apparently uneasy with the growing presence of radical elements on the ground.
According to Davutoğlu, the chief cause of al-Nusra’s ascendancy among opposition forces is the approach of the West towards the Syrian opposition fighters. He stressed the fact that the denial of military assistance to the moderate groups such as the Free Syrian Army (FSA) led by Gen. Salim İdris fuelled the support to Nusra-like units.
Davutoğlu further stated that designating the al-Nusra Front as a terrorist group produced the opposite of the desired effect and contributed to its growing presence.
He said Turkey opposes all radical groups in Syria, however, adding that Ankara views al-Nusra factor not as a cause but as an effect and consequence of what the Assad regime has done in Syria. Davutoğlu pointed out that he urged the US officials in the meeting in Washington also to focus on the conditions that created al-Nusra, rather than just being concerned about the group itself.
Davutoğlu also denied claims of Turkey’s military assistance and supply of weapons to the Syrian opposition, saying that those who always question Ankara’s position must closely look at what others are doing on ground.