World Bulletin / News Desk
Russia wants to know more about the scale and scope of NATO's post-2014 mission in Afghanistan before deciding whether to keep cooperating with the Western alliance, an envoy for President Vladimir Putin said on Thursday.
Moscow, NATO's Cold War-era foe and still a frequent critic, fears instability in Afghanistan after the pullout of most foreign troops by the end of 2014 may spill over into ex-Soviet Central Asia and threaten Russia's own southern borders.
The former Soviet Union sent troops into Afghanistan in 1979 and withdrew its forces by early 1989 after a disastrous war.
Moscow supported the U.S.-led invasion after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks and has allowed transit of supplies for NATO's International Security Assistance Force (ISAF), including through a new hub in the city of Ulyanovsk.
But Zamir Kabulov, Putin's special envoy for Afghanistan, told Reuters that Russia wanted "full clarity" on the combat capabilities of the post-2014 mission and reiterated a threat to withdraw cooperation unless the alliance receives approval from the U.N. Security Council, where Moscow holds veto power.
"At the end of the day NATO is a military bloc. If a military-political group appears in the neighbourhood of Russian territory, without our consent and with tasks unknown to us, this is problematic. A mandate is indispensable," Kabulov said.
"Our current cooperation with NATO is based on the current NATO mandate from the U.N. Security Council. And we will only cooperate with such missions as have a mandate for which we have also voted," he told Reuters in an interview.
NATO aims to hand security responsibility to Afghans in 2014 and revamp its mission into a training and advisory one.
Russia's acting ambassador to NATO said this month that Russia would stop cooperating over Afghanistan post-2014 if no Security Council resolution authorising the new mission is secured. A NATO official said it would be helpful but stopped short of saying it was essential.
Kabulov, a former ambassador to Kabul, said Moscow wanted more information about foreign forces in Afghanistan after 2014.
"The Americans say various things. Generally they say it will be a training mission, but then it becomes clear that there will be special forces, combat groups that will engage in combat in case of necessity," he said.
"We need full clarity on the capacities they will have, what that is supposed to be. Because such a strong network of foreign military bases in the region provokes questions."
NATO has not yet given details on how many troops it wants to deploy in Afghanistan post-2014 but Kabulov questioned the ability of a limited force to ensure stability when tens of thousands of ISAF troops have not managed to do that.
"And if they are not there for this purpose, then what for? This is our question and we are asking for a clear answer," he said. "Imagine several thousand instructors sitting in a base and suddenly being attacked by the Taliban. What will they say, 'Don't shoot, we are instructors'?"
He added any final decision on cooperation with NATO in Afghanistan was in the hands of Putin, whose term ends in 2018.
After the Soviet experience in Afghanistan in the 1980s, Russia ruled out sending soldiers to aid the United States and NATO this time around.
Kabulov said Moscow was ready to supply Kabul with arms, including air-defence systems, any time.
" NATO itself does nothing without air coverage in Afghanistan. Why should the Afghan army not have that? No modern army can do without it ... We are ready for this, but there have been no detailed talks about it yet," he said.
Kabulov said he saw the overall situation in Afghanistan deteriorating and said NATO failed to meet its goals there, but admitted things were better now than before ISAF was launched.
"If destabilisation becomes a regional phenomenon, which has already happened in practice in many ways, then obviously Russia will have to redirect large resources from domestic development to safeguard its national interests and security. We would not like that," he said in his office at Russia's Foreign Ministry.
"We are ready to cooperate with NATO on Afghanistan not because we like NATO, not at all, but because it corresponds with our own interests. This is a very pragmatic approach, nothing personal," he said.
Report says government minister asked US embassy to refrain from using term during high-level talks
In Brussels, Abe seeks to strengthen economic relations between Japan and the European Union
US military confirms incident for which Taliban claims responsibility
South Korean government stresses Iran's opposition to nuclear weapons on Korean Peninsula, as Pyongyang reportedly mulls fifth nuclear test
Comments come after Abu Sayyaf beheaded Canadian hostage, released 10 Indonesian sailors
Meters bill patients 50 yuan ($7.70) for transportation for up to 3 kilometers, and 7 yuan for every kilometer thereafter
Homes destroyed in Rakhine's squalid Baw Du Pha camp, inhabited by mostly Rohingya Muslims for almost four years.
Interior minister says 'government of Pakistan and not Donald Trump' will decide the fate of imprisoned doctor who helped track down Osama bin Laden
Doctors Without Borders calls for impartial inquiry into air strike that killed 42
Minister refuses to comment on if employer of 10 sailors freed Sunday contributed to $1 million ransom
Beijing insisting on legal rights of mainland’s judicial bodies over Taiwanese suspects it accuses of telecom fraud
Police confirm release of 10 sailors abducted from boat in March
Political and historic tensions discussed during first bilateral by top Japanese diplomat to Beijing in over 4 years
Umbrella group of insurgents says military gov’t delegation refused to endorse previously agreed upon ‘terms of reference’
The survivors of the hospital bombing in Afghanistan have called for the US to stand trial
U.S. military report concludes airstrike on facility in Kunduz unintentional