While most Western liberals continue to claim French President Emmanuel Macron as their champion, the realpolitik behind his rhetoric is far more worrisome than one might assume. In contrast to Donald Trump, whose lies have continuously been identified, Macron is much more successful in masquerading the reality of his politics behind a cosmopolitan and seemingly liberal face.
A new pro-business labor law and university reforms that restrict admission procedures have passed without much protest. The latest target of the reform was immigration policy to be introduced in February or March, which sparked criticism from leading human rights groups as well as a constitutionally mandated ombudsman. Amid these restrictive policies, Macron made headlines by calling for a "reorganization of Islam" in France.
Macron already tried to impress the Muslim electorate during the elections. He would not repeat the discourse on French national identity and laïcité [French secularism] that excludes Muslims from the collective French body. Many Muslims felt some optimism.
Some of the the same optimism had been felt toward Sarkozy on account of his beginning to embrace Muslims before he turned his back to them years later. So there is room for skepticism.
Macron argued that he was “working on the structuring (he used the word “structuration”) of Islam in France and also on how to explain it, which is extremely important”.
The ultimate aim of this process is the preservation of national cohesion, Macron argued, which would stand at the heart of the French idea of secularism to give people the freedom to choose to believe or not to believe. But at the same time, he also argued that this would be part of an effort to “fight fundamentalism”.
This idea of defense, seeing France threatened by Islamic fundamentalism, is intertwined with Macron’s attempt to “better integrate” Islam in France in order to “place it in a more peaceful relationship with the state”. By this, he wants to “lay the groundwork for the entire reorganization of Islam in France”, he argued. So, what is at stake for the French president?
Macron’s plan, which has not yet been revealed in full detail, seems to be based on numerous views: One is the financing of Islam and the second is the training of Imams in France. Establishing a “Grand Imam of France” seems to be one aspect of this restructuring.
Macron explicitly argued that he wants to “reduce the influence of Arab countries”, which, for him, “prevents French Islam from returning to modernity”. This reflects a very racist notion, assuming that Europe represents the height of civilization, while Arabs stand for backwardness. But this topos legitimizes his demand for restricting foreign governments from funding Muslim institutions in France.
Institutionalizing Islam would mean shifting Muslims away from a law that regulates non-profit associations to a law that regulates cultural associations and is under stricter financial control by the state. The French interior minister already said that the French government should intervene and create “imams of the French Republic” instead of “imams of foreign countries”.
While this argument does make sense insofar as imams should not be representatives of foreign governments, proofs must be presented that this is the case at hand.
The interior minister represented a hard line on this issue: “I suggest stopping foreign financing of mosques and closing Salafist mosques. Any foreign imam who makes a speech contrary to the values of the Republic must be expelled”.
Again, this seems to target Muslims first and foremost, while giving other religious denominations space to have transnational relations, getting financial support from abroad, like, for instance, Mormon missionaries or the Vatican helping the Catholic Church.
This reminds us of similar initiatives in other European countries. Similar to other initiatives, this French plan -- which shall be announced in greater detail within the next half year -- is followed no less vigorously by the Interior Ministry. Also, in 2017, the Italian government proclaimed its attempt to create an Italian Islam.
Again, this was done by the Italian Interior Ministry. And the Austrian Interior Ministry was initiating a process to create a new Islam Act, which was finally introduced in 2015 under severe criticism.
Also, in Germany, it is the Interior Ministry which initiated the German Islam Conference back in 2007, which also led to lots of criticism. A structural trait of these policies is a relatively soft discourse accompanied by hard policies.
The newly elected Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz is probably an ideal example of this strategy. While fully endorsing the statement that Islam was part of Austria and hence winning the hearts of many Muslims, he later introduced the most authoritarian system of institutionalizing Islam in Austria, again with a smiling face.
Emmanuel Macron argues that “the state should be neutral” in France, which, according to him, “is at the heart of secularism”. This claim is very much true. But it would fundamentally contradict postulated restrictions on Muslim institutions such as regulating their finances and seeing only French-educated Muslims as the good Muslims, while foreign-educated ones are the bad ones. It will be important to keep a close look at the proposals, which Macron promised to present within the next six months.
The downfall of an empire is often replaced by the rise of another.
The White House's peace plan is said to be days away. Meanwhile, Israel is getting a US nod as it carries on seizing Palestinian land
Newly-organized UN in Myanmar has shelved organization’s own governing principles of transparency and inclusivity, as evidenced by freshly-inked MOU with Myanmar
Recent developments in Syria – involving both US and Turkey – appear to have altered balance of power
For Saudi-led coalition, effort against Qatar has yet to bear fruit, other than Doha’s cooperation in cracking down on funding of terrorism
Like the previous US administrations, the ‘do more’ narrative is still the main discourse of administration under Donald Trump. The US civil and military leadership frequently uses this phrase and advises other nations, including its allies and partner countries, to push them into the war-like situation.
Iranian leaders may initially resist U.S. offer for new comprehensive deal, but they will be ready for another act of ‘heroic softness’ as soon as they are convinced that it will add a few years to life of Islamic Republic
Trump did not lend a helping hand to Israelis to choose Jerusalem as the rock of their existence; all he did was offer Netanyahu a gift to consolidate his position
US President Donald Trump by his unilateral decision to walkout from the Iran Nuclear deal of 2015 has deserted his western allies and triggered new crisis in the Middle East.
If we leave aside the debate on whether Israel locates in Europe or not, the essential question is whether Israel cares about the European countries as the European countries bless Israel in both politics and cultural sphere.
AI, with its most recent report, pours fuel on violent anti-Rohingya racism in genocidal Myanmar and anti-Muslim India
Christ Church in Alexandria, Va., a historic Episcopal church, hasn’t been a particularly political congregation. It has welcomed Democratic and Republican presidents. George Washington and Robert E. Lee were members. Stone plaques commemorating them adorn a wall.
Political instability, among other problems plaguing the Afghan society for years, is taking a terrible toll on Afghan youth
Drawing up Iraq’s next government will be no easy task, according to initial results of Saturday’s poll
Despite Mohammed bin Salman’s rhetoric that Saudi Arabia is on the cusp of radical social change, he is reluctant to confront institutional challenges and built-in societal resistance to implementation of radical social reforms
Today, African Americans will have to dig pretty deep to find that foundation because there’s not much optimism in sight.