World Bulletin / News Desk
Genetically engineered babies should be allowed in the future when the technology becomes available, according to a report released by a committee comprised of 21 leading scientists.
However, human gene editing must be restricted to only preventing diseases or disabilities in babies, the panel argued. The policy group behind the 261 page report published Tuesday was put together by the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Medicine.
Essentially, the group contends that gene-editing using new technologies could be allowed in human embryos, eggs and sperm, but not to create “designer” children.
“Human genome editing holds tremendous promise for understanding, treating, or preventing many devastating genetic diseases, and for improving treatment of many other illnesses,” Alta Charo, co-chair of the study committee and a bioethicist at University of Wisconsin-Madison, said in a statement.
“However, genome editing to enhance traits or abilities beyond ordinary health raises concerns about whether the benefits can outweigh the risks, and about fairness if available only to some people."
Regulations on studying gene editing need to be especially stringent for changes to “germline” genes, i.e. genes that are inherited from parents to children. Studies of multiple generations would have to be conducted in order to fully understand the implications of editing germline genes.
A global prohibition on human gene editing is not practical, the scientists concede, when access to CRISPR gene editing tools have become so cheap in the past two years. Scientists in China, for example, are already using the technology on human cells.
“Genome editing research is very much an international endeavor, and all nations should ensure that any potential clinical applications reflect societal values and be subject to appropriate oversight and regulation," said committee co-chairs Richard Hynes, of Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and Daniel K. Ludwig, of Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said in a joint statement.
"These overarching principles and the responsibilities that flow from them should be reflected in each nation's scientific community and regulatory processes.”
'Protecting human rights is key to responding to the Ebola outbreak,' HRW says
World Health Organization and Public Health Ministry on May 8 announced confirmed cases of Ebola in the country
Ebola outbreak in Democratic Republic of Congo is a 'wake-up call,' says head of West African Health Organization
Tobacco use is falling, but not fast enough, with active or passive smoking killing over 7 million people every year
Slogan for this year's campaign is 'Time to see beauties'
Developed by high school students in west Turkey, microchip gets award in US, Europe
UN reports cases of Ebola virus disease 'in an urban center' that killed 25 so far
In a statement, the UN agency said WHO Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus would convene an emergency committee to discuss the matter.
Following is a recap of past epidemics of Ebola as the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) battles a new outbreak of the deadly tropical disease:
In the absence of rules, travel agencies offer trips to the region on boats sometimes equipped with helicopters or submarines, according to Segolene Royal, French ambassador for the Arctic and Antarctic poles.
Three health care workers among 19 deaths, World Health Organization says
World Health Organization concerned about potential regional spread of deadly virus
Doctors Worldwide provides orthopaedic training to health personnel
People suffering from advanced cardiac or pulmonary insufficiency to benefit from device made at university in Izmir