World Bulletin / News Desk
In a ruling on two separate appeals made by Belgium and France over the headscarf ban, the court said companies could bar staff from "visible wearing of any political, philosophical or religious sign".
In both cases, the appeal courts of Belgium and France had urged the EU court to give a joint judgement on the issue.
The EU court further said the decision to ban such symbols at workplaces was not discriminatory.
“An internal rule of an undertaking which prohibits the visible wearing of any political, philosophical or religious sign does not constitute direct discrimination," it said.
“The prohibition on wearing an Islamic headscarf, which arises from an internal rule of a private undertaking prohibiting the visible wearing of any political, philosophical or religious sign in the workplace, does not constitute direct discrimination based on religion or belief within the meaning of the directive," the court said in its ruling.
The ruling was encouraged by two separate cases of Muslim women who were fired for wearing a headscarf at their workplaces based in Belgium and France.
Samira Achbita, a Muslim receptionist at G4S company in Belgium, filed a legal complaint at a Belgian court in 2006 after she was fired from the company for wearing a headscarf at her workplace.
Achbita was fired under an internal amendment to G4S workplace regulations, which provides that “employees are prohibited, in the workplace, from wearing any visible signs of their political, philosophical or religious beliefs and/or from engaging in any observance of such beliefs”.
The Belgian Court of Cessation had urged the Court of Justice of the European Union to interfere in the issue.
In the second case, a French company had dismissed a Muslim woman worker in 2008 for wearing a headscarf.
Asma Bougnaoui, a Micropole employee, had brought the matter to the French Court of Cassation, which then asked the EU justice court “whether the willingness of an employer to take account of the wishes of a customer no longer to have that employer’s services provided by a worker wearing an Islamic headscarf may be considered a ‘genuine and determining occupational requirement’ within the meaning of the directive.”
In its ruling, the European court answered that “the willingness of an employer to take account of the wishes of a customer no longer to have the services of that employer provided by a worker wearing an Islamic headscarf cannot be considered a genuine and determining occupational requirement within the meaning of the directive.”
*Anadolu Agency Correspondent Sorwar Alam contributed this story from Ankara
Businessman Rashid Nekkaz covered face with banknotes, pictures of Austrian foreign minister over so-called 'burqa ban'
Protestors: We are talking about Shariah law, which goes against the Constitution of Canada
Interior ministry says offenders could face fines, or be taken into custody
New Charlie Hebdo cover accused of stirring up hatred against Muslims by linking Islam to terrorism
Muslims now facing more serious threat as far-right groups not hesitating to use violence
Jewish, anti-Islamophobia groups make joint complaint about controversial tabloid piece
Donor pledges 1M pesos to each kin of fallen troops involved in Marawi operation where army fights ISIL-linked militants
Authorities claim they were operating without official permission
'Direct connection' between misleading information about Islam, uptick in Islamophobic attacks, says Imam Omar Suleiman
Syrian woman divorcing from husband instructed to remove headscarf at hearing
Negative media portrayals of British Muslims leading to increased hostility, say observers
John Tomlin turns himself into police after attack lets 2 Mulsim cousins with ‘life-changing injuries’
Surge in anti-Muslim hate crime leaves many fearful for the future
Academics from leading universities see links between 'white supremacy problem' and Islamophobia in the US and Europe
Darren Osborne, 47, will be charged with terrorism-related murder, attempted murder, say UK prosecutors