Dr. Namaz Nurmumin Muhammed
The region of Central Asia which was formerly referred to as Turkestan, has been confronted with the most busiest and crucial days since the end of the Soviet regime, maybe even a time where existence or non existence is of concern. Hence now is the time that the destiny of this region Central Asia will be determined, depending on the direction it takes hereon.
We can briefly summarize the events of the region as follows: Uzbekistan has a new leadership in power, Kazakhstan is heading towards a change in regime. This means that there is a structural change in these two influential nations of Central Asia which has a comprised land area of 3 million kilometers square and a population of approximately 50 million.
After the death of Islam Kerimov who was a communist and Soviet type leader right down to his core, the Uzbek Prime Minister Sevket Mirziyayev who had claimed the leadership had hinted that he would pursue nationalist politics aimed at the people, on the 4th of December prior to being elected President. He made a speech to the people as the temporary President and said 'Whoever has any problem should convey the message directly to the head of the state' and set up an online platform accordingly as 'Online petition'. It is said that the applications made on this 'platform' is over 270 thousand already. Hence the people of Uzbekistan who had only been forced to praise Islam Kerimov during the time of his leadership, finally now have the opportunity to express their own personal and social concerns. This step taken by Sevket Mirziyayev and allowing for the freedom of some of the opposition, has aroused an atmosphere of freedom in Uzbekistan that can be compared to events such as the throwing of a shoe by Nikita Krusev who had come into power after the Stalin period, while at the UN platform, which resulted in the softening of the Soviet regime, or, like the release of millions of people in Siberia by Stalin who had imprisoned them earlier...
On the other hand Nursultan Nazarbayev, who is referred to as 'White beard of the Turk Islam world', during a speech made at the ceremony commemorating the 25 th anniversary of the independence of Kazakhstan had declared the regime change to be made in his nation. From here on Kazakhstan would continue to be ruled in the same manner as Turkey with a presidential system, however the parliament and government would be strengthened. With this Nazarbayev would ease his own authoritarian regime that he had used to rule over the people in order to reconstruct his own people and state, expressing concerns that especially he would not allow the nation being partitioned amongst the family members of the ruling government in the future.
Uzbekistan, after the Kerimov period and the more freedom based politics observed by Kazakhstan is of crucial importance for the existence of Central Asia. Hence the politics of Kerimov who not only considered the outside world as an enemy but also considered his neighbors in Central Asia as an enemy and therefore closed all boundaries, had a detrimental impact on the nations and states of this region who shares the same language, religion, culture and history.
Sevket Mirziyayev who had taken his place, had taken steps even only in the first days of office to ease the borders of Kirghistan and Tajikistan, which Uzbekistan had the biggest problems with during the period of Kerimov, in order to reestablish closer ties with the people and governments of these nations. The Uzbek and Kirghiz governments and cultural delegations had visited these nations correspondingly, the Uzbeks had been to Tajikistan and Tashkent-Dusanbe flights were reopened after 24 years.
One of the most important steps of the government of Sevket Mirziyayev was the announcement that he would not attend the summits of military KGAO and Eurasian Economic Unity, under the leadership of the Russian President Putin who constantly makes reference to the revival of the former USSR, but instead would strengthen relations with neighboring and brotherhood nations of Central Asia.
Hence, in this aspect the close ties of Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan is of most importance in Central Asia. The positive outcomes primarily in economics and culture, including other areas, of these two nations which have bonded together with a strategic partnership agreement, leaves no doubt in anybody's mind that it will be influential in the near future of Central Asia.
Hence Nursultan Nazarbayev, who is a diplomatic leader not only in Central Asia but also in the old Soviet borders, has established tight contact with the new Uzbek leader Sevket Mirziyayev and these two leaders will probably come together any day now.
In addition, the biggest damage made by the Soviets to this region being the tragedy of the Aral lake drying up, is a mutual problem of Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan. It is of most importance that the two nations of this region which has been mostly effected by this tragedy, act in cohesion together and on the international platform to solve this problem.
At this stage it is expected from the governments of these brother nations of Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan, to continue policies to enhance more freedom and personal values, to open boundaries with each other in order to enhance mutual economic trade and mutual market; in addition making greater efforts to allow the people of Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan, who share the same language, religion and destiny to come even closer together.
If we leave aside the debate on whether Israel locates in Europe or not, the essential question is whether Israel cares about the European countries as the European countries bless Israel in both politics and cultural sphere.
AI, with its most recent report, pours fuel on violent anti-Rohingya racism in genocidal Myanmar and anti-Muslim India
Christ Church in Alexandria, Va., a historic Episcopal church, hasn’t been a particularly political congregation. It has welcomed Democratic and Republican presidents. George Washington and Robert E. Lee were members. Stone plaques commemorating them adorn a wall.
Political instability, among other problems plaguing the Afghan society for years, is taking a terrible toll on Afghan youth
Drawing up Iraq’s next government will be no easy task, according to initial results of Saturday’s poll
Despite Mohammed bin Salman’s rhetoric that Saudi Arabia is on the cusp of radical social change, he is reluctant to confront institutional challenges and built-in societal resistance to implementation of radical social reforms
Today, African Americans will have to dig pretty deep to find that foundation because there’s not much optimism in sight.
Conflicts in this region will never end with the victory of one party, one regime, or one country
During the past few years, there has been an increasing trend of hostilities against Islam and its followers, particularly in the countries where they are sizeably in minority. The phenomenon has been visible globally, though with a remarkable difference in intensity.
Lebanese have acquired a faculty for blaming others for errors they themselves have engineered; upcoming elections won’t be any different
Why de-radicalization programs need to target Christian extremist groups too
Israel is concerned about growing Iranian presence in Syria more than anything
Both leaders’ focus very much begins at home, but their domestic aspirations have big international consequences.
Abandonment of principle of equality as a basis for democracy that ought to secure the equal treatment of all of its citizens means that we are witnessing a re-emerging political order
Both America and Russia would have wanted this crisis in Syria to blow over but it appears that a contained military response is unavoidable
Open letters, one after another, accuse Supreme Leader of turning a blind eye to problems preparing downfall of Islamic Republic