Zaki Shaikh / London
The advances in precision bombs have allowed Russia to use its nuclear weapons option as part of a tactical bargaining.
Recent efforts for modernizing and upgrading their defense capabilities have led Russia to develop bombs which are both precise and sophisticated.
However, some experts, such as Konstantin Sivkov, continue to advocate pursuing a two-track approach for developing and maintaining strategic nuclear forces while also bringing strategic non-nuclear-capabilities to a new qualitative level, the Russian Defense Industry Courier reported on Sunday.
Russian Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu has hinted that recent advances might enable Russia to alter its strategic calculus, thus opening up prospects for a bargain on nuclear weapons.
Pursuing such an option would allow Moscow to approach its deterrence dynamics differently and may provide them more maneuverability to pursue nuclear balance, in relation to the U.S. and NATO more flexibly.
In recent months, Russia demonstrated the use of Kalibr cruise missile, describing them as “highly effective, high precision weapons that can be equipped with conventional or special war-heads when needed”.
The Russian Defense Industry Courier quoted Shoigu saying: "By 2021, the combat capabilities of Russian strategic non-nuclear forces will more than quadruple, which will provide the opportunity to solve the issue of non-nuclear deterrence, as in four years ships and submarines with cruise missiles will constitute the basis for the formations of the carriers for long range precision weapons.”
Shoigu’s remarks were taken from a Jan. 12 lecture in which he declared that in future, precision weapons could serve as a factor of strategic deterrence, replacing a reliance on nuclear power.
Ruslan Pukhov, director of Moscow’s Strategy and Technology Analytical Centre, told Russian Defense Ministry’s Zvezda TV channel that Russia may not prefer to load nuclear warheads on its long-range bombs because it is pursuing more effective options.
Pukhov pointed out that the option of advanced non-nuclear weapons can boost Russia’s defensive and offensive offers.
Following the display of caliber missiles in Syria, Russia has pursued development of X-101 cruise missiles, which they claim have far more accuracy and destructive power, the RU-SMI website reported on Saturday.
These missiles can be transported on a Tupolev Tu-95 turboprop strategic bomber and missile carrier aircraft which can carry up to 24,000 kilograms in rocket weight for a minimum distance of 5,500 kilometers (3,100 miles), the source added.
Russian sources have also boasted about the X-101’s capability to assume lower visibility, thus deceiving radar detection, reported RU-SMI.
Moscow’s Nezavisimaya Gazeta quoted General Sergey Karakaiva on Friday as saying that the share of new missile systems was at 26 percent among the overall missile arsenal and would continue to grow. The newspaper also quoted Defense Minister Shoigu, stating the armed forces had delivered 41 new ballistic missiles, which modernized the nuclear arsenal by up to 60 percent.
Shoigu has recently suggested that in future it will be possible to make a gradual shift from the option of nuclear deterrent to the non-nuclear as, by 2021, Russia’s strategic non-nuclear forces will have four times increased combat capabilities, something which will provide the opportunity to fully acquire full non-nuclear deterrence.
Russia is seeking to combine precision-guided weaponry with modern sensors, communications and electronic capabilities. It is not shy from hinting about the new spectrum of its capabilities in pursuing an increasing role for non-nuclear-weapons with precision strike capability as their new doctrine.
Those recent developments may enable Russia to carry out precision, low-yield-strikes when and where necessary.
Referring to the steps that should be taken to reduce physical threats to Russia’s security, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov reminded the media in Moscow January 17 to “keep in mind absolutely all factors that influence strategic stability”.
Lavrov added that besides nuclear weapons there were many factors weighing in which include “strategic conventional weapons, including hypersonic weapons that can destroy targets in any part of the world within an hour even without nuclear warheads. Those who have these weapons do not need nuclear weapons”.
Lavrov went to name the Ballistic Missile Defence (BMD) system as the second factor which is changing the strategic balance: “We need to negotiate this issue, so that any changes in strategic balance will not destabilize the situation,” he said.
Lavrov also pointed to “the space militarization plans of the current and previous U.S. administrations” as well as to “the U.S.’ refusal to ratify the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty” as factors “influencing global strategic balance and parity”.
Lately, Russian defense forces decided to pursue the path of increasing combat effectiveness to an extent to allow them to exchange the nuclear trump card in favor of advanced non-nuclear weapons that are potentially more powerful, the RU-SMI website reported Saturday.
If we leave aside the debate on whether Israel locates in Europe or not, the essential question is whether Israel cares about the European countries as the European countries bless Israel in both politics and cultural sphere.
AI, with its most recent report, pours fuel on violent anti-Rohingya racism in genocidal Myanmar and anti-Muslim India
Christ Church in Alexandria, Va., a historic Episcopal church, hasn’t been a particularly political congregation. It has welcomed Democratic and Republican presidents. George Washington and Robert E. Lee were members. Stone plaques commemorating them adorn a wall.
Political instability, among other problems plaguing the Afghan society for years, is taking a terrible toll on Afghan youth
Drawing up Iraq’s next government will be no easy task, according to initial results of Saturday’s poll
Despite Mohammed bin Salman’s rhetoric that Saudi Arabia is on the cusp of radical social change, he is reluctant to confront institutional challenges and built-in societal resistance to implementation of radical social reforms
Today, African Americans will have to dig pretty deep to find that foundation because there’s not much optimism in sight.
Conflicts in this region will never end with the victory of one party, one regime, or one country
During the past few years, there has been an increasing trend of hostilities against Islam and its followers, particularly in the countries where they are sizeably in minority. The phenomenon has been visible globally, though with a remarkable difference in intensity.
Lebanese have acquired a faculty for blaming others for errors they themselves have engineered; upcoming elections won’t be any different
Why de-radicalization programs need to target Christian extremist groups too
Israel is concerned about growing Iranian presence in Syria more than anything
Both leaders’ focus very much begins at home, but their domestic aspirations have big international consequences.
Abandonment of principle of equality as a basis for democracy that ought to secure the equal treatment of all of its citizens means that we are witnessing a re-emerging political order
Both America and Russia would have wanted this crisis in Syria to blow over but it appears that a contained military response is unavoidable
Open letters, one after another, accuse Supreme Leader of turning a blind eye to problems preparing downfall of Islamic Republic