Taha Kılıç/Yeni Şafak Writer
The operation started jointly by the Iraqi military units, Kurdish peshmerga forces, Shiite militia and Arab tribal forces on October 17, 2016, with aerial support from U.S.-backed coalition forces, to save Mosul from Daesh, is in the final stage. With the clearance of the city’s west, Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi is expected to shortly and officially announce the “vıctory of Mosul.”
Mosul, Iraq’s second largest city in terms of population before Daesh’s invasion, was predominantly Sunni. With Mosul no longer under the control of the Iraqi central government in 2014, two-thirds of the almost 3 million population left the region during this process. The city, which about 900,000 people also fled since October, appears almost abandoned. While the operation to save Mosul led to serious loss of civilian lives, the city’s western side has turned into complete ruins. One of the historical artifacts destroyed during the clashes is Mosul’s symbolic al-Nouri Mosque (Mosul Grand Mosque). Daesh leader Abubakr al-Baghdadi made his famous declaration of the caliphate on July 4, 2014 at this mosque.
According to a statement by United Nations authorities, the cost of rebuilding Mosul after the war is at least $3 billion. As it is stated that six of the 44 neighborhoods on the city’s west side are completely destroyed, it is noted that it will take two years of work to make Mosul livable once again.
The most important question post-war is whether Mosul’s demographic balances before Daesh can be protected. We can say that Mosul, which is one of the disputed areas between the northern Iraqi Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) and the central Baghdad administration, will continue to remain one of the focus points of conflicts and political crises in the post-Daesh period as well.
With the emergence of Daesh, it was as if Iraq had forgotten its own decades-old fundamental problems or postponed them for a while. However, now, with Daesh forces starting to be dispersed, these problems are going to return and with greater speed. Sunni-Shiite clashes, fights over sharing oil regions, the debates that broke out with the KRG’s announcing the referendum for independence, Kirkuk’s status problem, the interventions of Western outside forces, primarily the U.S., making plans for the future of Iraq, Iran’s political pressure and efficiency over Baghdad… In the new era, Iraq is going to be at the center of such and similar crises.
The tragic experience of Daesh witnessed by the country (and region), was almost like the summary of the problems that piled up in Iraq’s last century. If we do not consider the efforts of foreign intelligence organizations, it is known today that Daesh’s backbone consists of Iraqı-origin people. The fury and grudges accumulated over the years emerged as a savage and crazed terrorist organization. In time, violence led to violence, anger led to anger, hatred led to hatred, they multiplied and were brewed. Onwards, Iraq is a lot more fragile today, its citizens have a greater lack of trust and are filled with grudges toward one another; everyone is a lot busier with their own plans and gains.
The adventure is not yet over, but when the historians of the future are evaluating the structure called Daesh, they will certainly stress the reality that this organization is a critical stage in the division of Iraq and Syria. Daesh is going to be evaluated as the start of a new era in which Kurds and Shiite elements stand out in Iraq and Syria as the dominant power – with the rough interventions of the U.S., Russia and Iran.
Iraq is a country whose map was drawn at the table, where numerous races, religions and sects that had no experience of coexistence, were imprisoned within the same cage to almost “kill each other.” When we look at Iraq’s history from the early 1920s, this is why we see blood and tears alone. The liberators, those liberating from the liberators, those liberating from those liberating from the liberators… Iraq’s recent history consists of the non-stop repetition of this vicious circle. Every “salvation” phase is the precursor of periods bloodier than the one before.
Of course, it is always the civilians who suffer the greatest injury in all of these historic phases. In Iraq, where, from time to time, another segment becomes the victim based on the color of the ideology dominating the country, there is no ethnicity and religious class that has not experienced massacre and exile. It seems that these traumas, whose traces have remained throughout generations and have now become permanent, are going to pave the way for the division of Iraq in the not-so-distant future.
Similar to a marriage that started off on the wrong foot and is destined to end, it is impossible for Iraq to live in peace and calm in its current appearance. In the country that is physically divided in to three pieces, a long and tough struggle will be witnessed for this physical state to become official. The formation of Daesh was almost like the signal flare for this.
Will division bring peace to Iraqi peoples? Unfortunately, within the context of the Middle East’s current balances and dynamics, it is not possible to answer this in the positive either.
UN structural reform should target more inclusivity, justice, not held hostage to the permanent members’ caprice and jealousy
If Bosnia plays its cards right, it could lay the ground for becoming Europe’s cradle of black gold
N. Korean regime has most recently made headlines with its alleged testing of a hydrogen bomb
The presence of 10,000 nuclear weapons makes it impossible to take a deep breath and relax
According to reports prepared by nongovernmental organizations, the Rohingyas are in the final stages of the genocide process.
Ending NAFTA would see middle- and low-income Americans pay more to meet consumer needs
Despite not being a politician coming from the base, Trump had his candidacy accepted in the party and won the election against Hillary Clinton.
In differing ways, Iraq's political elite is trying to capitalize upon nationalist narratives
Washington may have to develop new understanding on dealing with new nuclear competitor situated near key allies
Remarks by President Trump on the strategy in Afghan war point out his bid for reelection than winning in Afghanistan
In response to Kim Jong-un regime, US administration seems to be adopting new policy of 'strategic accountability'
The question whether the emergence of Pakistan on world map was a mistake remains relevant
Iran reels under quarrel between Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei and President Rouhani
By threatening to shut down Al Jazeera’s offices, Israel appears to be taking page from its professed enemies' playbook
India supports Bhutan's claim over this piece of land and sent its military reinforcement to stop the Chinese road construction.
In connection with the aforementioned clash, Turkey and the UAE (United Arab Emirates) found themselves at different sides of the division within the region