Dr. Maung Zarni
With the 22 May release of its report “Attacks by the Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army on Hindus in northern Rakhine State”, Amnesty International has poured fuel on the anti-Muslim fear and loathing in Burma as well as in Modi's violent anti-Muslim India.
To be sure, no human rights activist must object to human rights watchdogs carrying out their own mission.
However, it is deeply disturbing that Amnesty International, a Nobel-prize winner, released its latest report with a callous disregard as to the predictable international consequences for Rohingyas as well as other faith-based communities in Myanmar and beyond. Within 24 hours of the report’s release, Myanmar’s extremists are having a field day -- citing AI in order to further whip up anti-Rohingya racism. This incites the exact type of violence that Amnesty purports to try to prevent.
There are an estimated 40,000 – 60,000 Rohingya refugees concentrated in several pockets in India, living with very real threats of being burned-out or deported en mass. Violent Hindu extremism against Muslims of India has taken hold in Modi’s India, where innocent Rohingyas attempt to survive and sustain their families in precarious circumstances. By such Hindu groups they are wrongly associated with terrorism. In the midst of the genocidal violence by the security forces in Myanmar, the Modi government threatened to deport all Rohingya refugees in India in the interests of “national security”. Amnesty’s report, far from purveying hard but necessary facts in the interests of human rights, is likely to have a further detrimental
impact on those living in Myanmar, India and beyond.
Further, Amnesty’s report calls into question the real motive or unstated objective of the organization, beyond uncovering and reporting on a massacre allegedly committed by a Rohingya militant group.
While calling for an independent investigation into crimes against humanity committed by the Myanmar government and Rohingya militants, Amnesty proceeded to repeat verbatim Myanmar military’s official but never independently verified narrative -- that Myanmar’s “ethnic cleansing” of Rohingyas was triggered by ARSA insurgents: Amnesty copied, cut and pasted “ARSA launched coordinated attacks on 30 different police outposts”.
This talk of “Rohingya insurgency” in N. Rakhine has been rejected by senior UN officials, Special Envoys and former U.S. Government officials with years of expertise on Burmese affairs, including UN Special Rapporteur Yanghee Lee, UN Human Rights Chief Zeid and former U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for Refugees and Migration Eric Schwatz. It beggars belief that Amnesty with its standard independent verification would -- without problematizing it -- echo Myanmar’s invented pretext of “ARSA insurgency”. In compiling this report, Amnesty International was assisted by none other than the Ministry of Defence, which centrally coordinates with Myanmar Ministries of Information, Foreign Affairs, Home Affairs and Rakhine State administration without whose approval no foreign researcher could travel to Rakhine state. The Hindu witnesses and survivors from the reported massacre were brought to Sittwe by Myanmar authorities where they were in turn interviewed by Amnesty researchers.
Amidst the mounting pressure against Myanmar government for the mass killings and mass deportation of the Rohingya population from N. Rakhine region -- Myanmar’s “psych-war chief” Major General Aung Ye Win of “People’s Relations and the Armed Forces” Department was seen leading a group of domestic journalists on the military-organized tour examining the bodies of victims alleged to be Hindu. A Burmese journalist asked the propaganda General for concrete evidence that these killings were perpetrated by ARSA. He could not come up with a single shred of evidence other than saying that “it is clear that no Hindus would kill other Hindus”.
Apparently, Myanmar military facilitated Amnesty to generate that evidence.
Importantly, Amnesty used the word 'apartheid' in 2017 to refer to a situation which is widely recognized as killing fields and open prisons where people are slaughtered and mass raped, and being starved slowly, if they are not subject to direct slaughter. The apartheid was noticed decades before. In the article entitled “Burma’s Brand of Apartheid”, Far Eastern Economic Review (14 July 1978) described the Rohingyas' conditions as apartheid 39 years before Amnesty opted to characterize the conditions inside Myanmar under which Rohingyas have been forced to live. By now, less than half of the Rohingya population remain in their places of birth, where, according to UN Assistant Secretary General on Human Rights Andrew Gilmour, they are being starved into fleeing.
With this report, Amnesty has falsely put the two groups on a moral parity: ARSA, on the one hand, which is made up of desperate, hopeless and angry Rohingyas who are extremely primitively armed, and Myanmar's genocide-perpetrating government backed by world's major powers such as China, Russia, and India, one the other.
Tragically, those of us who are former card-carrying AI members have long known the organization to be pursuing its organizational agendas and interests while masquerading itself as a “uncompromising” and “principled” defender of human rights. In the world where everything is commodified and marketed, human rights becomes just another tradable item -- not a principle or ideal. Indeed, through this report, we can see that Amnesty has morphed into a human rights merchant, rather than acting as a genuine defender of human rights.
The White House's peace plan is said to be days away. Meanwhile, Israel is getting a US nod as it carries on seizing Palestinian land
Newly-organized UN in Myanmar has shelved organization’s own governing principles of transparency and inclusivity, as evidenced by freshly-inked MOU with Myanmar
Recent developments in Syria – involving both US and Turkey – appear to have altered balance of power
For Saudi-led coalition, effort against Qatar has yet to bear fruit, other than Doha’s cooperation in cracking down on funding of terrorism
Like the previous US administrations, the ‘do more’ narrative is still the main discourse of administration under Donald Trump. The US civil and military leadership frequently uses this phrase and advises other nations, including its allies and partner countries, to push them into the war-like situation.
Iranian leaders may initially resist U.S. offer for new comprehensive deal, but they will be ready for another act of ‘heroic softness’ as soon as they are convinced that it will add a few years to life of Islamic Republic
Trump did not lend a helping hand to Israelis to choose Jerusalem as the rock of their existence; all he did was offer Netanyahu a gift to consolidate his position
US President Donald Trump by his unilateral decision to walkout from the Iran Nuclear deal of 2015 has deserted his western allies and triggered new crisis in the Middle East.
If we leave aside the debate on whether Israel locates in Europe or not, the essential question is whether Israel cares about the European countries as the European countries bless Israel in both politics and cultural sphere.
AI, with its most recent report, pours fuel on violent anti-Rohingya racism in genocidal Myanmar and anti-Muslim India
Christ Church in Alexandria, Va., a historic Episcopal church, hasn’t been a particularly political congregation. It has welcomed Democratic and Republican presidents. George Washington and Robert E. Lee were members. Stone plaques commemorating them adorn a wall.
Political instability, among other problems plaguing the Afghan society for years, is taking a terrible toll on Afghan youth
Drawing up Iraq’s next government will be no easy task, according to initial results of Saturday’s poll
Despite Mohammed bin Salman’s rhetoric that Saudi Arabia is on the cusp of radical social change, he is reluctant to confront institutional challenges and built-in societal resistance to implementation of radical social reforms
Today, African Americans will have to dig pretty deep to find that foundation because there’s not much optimism in sight.
Conflicts in this region will never end with the victory of one party, one regime, or one country