World Bulletin / News Desk
Germany's trial of a 96-year-old former Nazi medical orderly at the Auschwitz death camp has collapsed, a court spokesman said Thursday.
No date for a retrial of Hubert Zafke has yet been set after the proceedings were derailed by complaints that the judges were biased.
"When this will happen we cannot say yet," Carl Friedrich Deutsch, a spokesman for the court, said in a statement.
Zafke had faced charges of at least 3,681 counts of being an accessory to murder in the concentration camp in Nazi-occupied Poland.
But concerns over his mental and physical health had led to repeated postponements of the trial in the northeastern lakeside town of Neubrandenburg.
Over the last few hearings, a parade of doctors have been quizzed about Zafke's mental health, reaching contradictory conclusions.
Prosecutors, and civil plaintiffs, had in turn launched motions of bias against the judges, charging that they were unwilling to try wheelchair-bound Zafke.
Deutsch said the prosecutors had asked three judges to recuse themselves. There was insufficient time to decide whether to grant or reject these requests before the next scheduled hearing next Monday.
The spokesman added bluntly that he couldn't understand why prosecutors would employ a legal tactic that left them open to charges they had "torpedoed the proceedings which they themselves had launched".
Anne Frank in Auschwitz
The charges against Zafke focus on a one-month period in 1944 when 14 trains carrying prisoners -- including the teenage diarist Anne Frank -- arrived at Auschwitz-Birkenau.
Frank, who arrived in Auschwitz with her parents and sister, was later transferred to another camp, Bergen-Belsen, where she died in March 1945, just two months before the Nazis were defeated.
Thursday's announcement marked the end of a case that had been marred by five delays and at times deteriorated into farce, increasingly frustrating victims' lawyers.
The International Auschwitz Committee, which represents Holocaust survivors, had sharply attacked Germany's handling of the case, saying the court was hurtling "between sloppy ignorance and complete disinterest" in a resolution.
Last Mod: 06 Ekim 2016, 19:58